Parasocial and Social Player-Avatar Relationships: Social Others in Thomas Was Alone

  • Elizabeth Loyer University of South Florida


The nature of the relationship between the player and a video game avatar has been the cause of much academic discussion and debate. While in the past most studies focused on parasocial relationships, the new Banks-Bowman social categorization system provides a beneficial and enlightening new framework with which to examine how the player relates to the avatar. The interactive mediums through which players relate with playable characters separate such relationships from those created with film or literary protagonists. This interactivity allows for social player-avatar relationships, including the avatar-as-social-other relationship exemplified in the game Thomas Was Alone, and creates new possibilities important for game designers to consider. This article first briefly explores the academic discussions surrounding the player-avatar relationship in light of the new Banks-Bowman categories, then turns attention to the ways in which the avatar-as-social-other relationship and its corresponding emotionally intense gameplay are exemplified in the game Thomas Was Alone.  

Author Biography

Elizabeth Loyer, University of South Florida
Undergraduate student at the University of South Florida (Tampa) majoring in Mathematics and English - Professional Writing, Rhetoric, and Technology.


Banks, J., & Bowman, N. D. (2014). Avatars are (sometimes) people too: Linguistic indicators of parasocial and social ties in player–avatar relationships. New Media & Society. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Bithell, M. (2012). Thomas Was Alone [PC Videogame]. London, UK: Mike Bithell.

Coulson, M., Barnett, J., Ferguson, C. J., & Gould, R. L. (2012). Real feelings for virtual people: Emotional attachments and interpersonal attraction in video games. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(3), 176-184. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Griebel, T. (2006). Self-portrayal in a simulated life: Projecting personality and values in The Sims 2. Game Studies, 6(1). Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Cook, M. S. (2010). Your Second Selves Player-Designed Avatars. Games and Culture, 5(1), 23-42. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Lankoski, P. (2011). Player character engagement in computer games. Games and Culture, 6(4), 291-311. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken. Jonathan Cape, London.
Newman, J. (2002). The myth of the ergodic videogame. Game Studies, 2(1), 1-17. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

O'Brien, M., & Kellan, A. (2011, January 24). Virtual Self. Web. National Science Foundation. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Papale, L. (2014). Beyond Identification: Defining the Relationships between Player and Avatar. Journal of Games Criticism, 1(2), 1-12. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Robinson, C. (2013, October 13). Why Do We Care About Fictional Characters? – Reality Check [Video File]. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Rugnetta, M. (2013, October 24). Controlling vs ‘Being’ Your Video Game Avatar | Idea Channel | PBS Digital Studios [Video File]. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from

Smith, A. (2012, June 28). Wot I Think: Thomas Was Alone. Retrieved 5 June 2015, from
June 5, 2015