Compassionate Play in The Ludic Century
In 2013 game designer Eric Zimmerman wrote a provocative manifesto entitled ‘Manifesto for a Ludic Century’ (2013a), in which Zimmerman declares the 21st Century’s dominant cultural form to be games. Consequently, Zimmerman proposes that the individual occupant of the century is therefore in a continuous state of game engagement. As such, this re-contextualisation of game space and play, indefinitely articulates the individual as a constant player and character, and thusly challenges the notions of selfhood. Importantly it should be noted, the state of a ludic century is explicitly assumed as a truth, however superficial it may appear. Accordingly, this paper is then afforded to be an extended hypothesis of the proposed ludic century, rather than a critical dissection and response to Zimmerman’s manifesto. This enables a hermeneutic framing of the questions: ‘What does it mean to live in a ludic century?’and ‘in what capacity may the self exist in the ludic century?’ These questions will attempt to distinguish play as an inherent cultural logic that extends beyond the limitations of explicit ‘gamification’ or instrumental play (Stenros et al., 2009; Zichermann, 2010). Concluding, it is claimed that the ludic century elicits a sustained delusion of self, as the player is confined to the designed game structure, which inhibits authentic engagement and interaction with environment and self. It is proposed that this evokes a form of suffering, the compassionate play within the ludic century.
Brass, M., & Haggard, P. (2007). To Do or Not to Do: The Neural Signature of Self-Control. Featured in The Journal of Neuroscience
Calleja, G. (2012). Erasing the Magic Circle. Featured in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, pp. 77-95. Springer
Castrova, E. (2005). The Almost-Magic Circle. In Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games, pp. 147-162. University of Chicago Press.
Crawford, G. (2009). Forgetting The Magic Circle (or Towards a Sociology of Video Games). University of Salford.
Daly, G., & Žižek, S. (2004). Conversations With Žižek. Polity Press.
Elger, C. E., A. D. Friederici, C. Koch, H. Luhmann, C. Von Dern Malsburg, R. Menzel, H. Monyer, F. Ro ̈ Sler, G. Roth, H. Scheich, and W. Singer. (2004). Das Manifest: Elf fu ̈hrende Neurowissenschaftler uber Gegenwart und Zukunft der Hirnforschung'. Featured in Gehirn und Geist 6, pp. 30–37.
Habermas, J. (2007). The Language Game of Responsible Agency and the Problem of Free Will: How can epistemic dualism be reconciled with ontological monism?' Featured in 'Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action. Routledge.
Huizinga, J. (1980). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Redwood Burn Ltd. First published in 1944.
Juul, J. (2008).The Magic Circle and the Puzzle Piece. Retrieved from http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2008/2455/pdf/digarec01_03.pdf
Lammes, S. (2006). Spatial Regimes of the Digital Playground: Cultural Functions of Spatial Identification in Post-Colonial Computergames. In: Gaming Realities. A Challenge for Digital Culture, pp. 236-243. Retrieved from http://digiplay.info/node/3208
Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action. In: The Behavioural and Brain Sciences.
Puddle, L. D., & Maulder P. S. (2013). Ground Reaction Forces and Loading Rates Associated with Parkour and Traditional Drop Landing Techniques. in Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, pp. 122-129. Retrieved from http://www.jssm.org/vol12/n1/17/v12n1-17pdf.pdf
Salen, K & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Sartre, J. P. (1984). Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology. Washington Square Press.
Stenros, J., Montola, M., Mäyrä, F. (2009). Pervasive Games in Media Culture.'Featured in Montola, M., Stenros,J., & Waern, A. (eds.). In Pervasive Games: Theory and Design, pp. 257-276. Burlington: Morgan Kaufman.
Taylor, T.L. (2007). Pushing the Borders: Player Participation and Game Culture. In Structures of Participation in Digital Culture, J. Karaganis (ed.), Network_Netplay. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Trevena, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Cortical Movement Preparation before and after a Conscious Decision to Move. In Consciousness and Cognition Volume 11, Issue 2.
Turner, B. S. (1999). The Possibility of Primitiveness: Towards a Sociology of Body Marks in Cool Societies. In Body & Society 2003.
Zichermann, A. (2011). How Games Make Kids Smarter. TedXYouth. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2N-5maKZ9Q
Zicherman, A. (2010). Fun is the Future: Mastering Gamification. Speaking at GoogleTechTalk. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O1gNVeaE4g
Zimmerman, E. (2013a). Manifesto for a Ludic Century. Retrieved from http://kotaku.com/manifesto-the-21st-century-will-be-defined-by-games-1275355204
Zimmerman, E. (2013b). What’s wrong with the Ludic Century? Retrieved from http://ericzimmerman.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/whats-wrong-with-the-ludic-century/
Zimmerman, E. (2013c). Twitter post. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/zimmermaneric/status/378728580702031872
Zimmerman, E. (2013d). G4C13 Keynote: Eric Zimmerman. At the Games For Change Conference. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRVa2Q5bq5o
Zimmerman, E. (2014). Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later. Retrieved from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/135063/jerked_around_by_the_magic_circle_.php?print=1
Žižek, S. (2014). Event: Philosophy in Transit. Penguin Books.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for papers and articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the University of Glasgow. It is a condition of publication that authors license their paper or article under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.